Chemical portal


Math Forum

Contact webmaster

online education
free homework help
chemistry problems
questions and answers

© 2017 WebQC.Org
All rights reserved

By using this website, you
signify your acceptance of
Terms and Conditions
and Privacy Policy.

  Sign up now to (1) ask a chemistry question, (2) share your expertise, (3) engage in conversation with other chemists.
Post new topic Reply to topic
   Chemical Community Forum Index : Chemistry forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jr. Member
Jr. Member

Joined: 17 Feb 2017
Posts: 7
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2017 7:17 pm    Post subject: Analysis of resonance theory from point of quantum mechanics Reply with quoteFind all posts by Ginto

Quantum-mechanical aspects of the L. Pauling's resonance theory.

If we consider the theory of resonance of Linus Pauling from position of quantum mechanics (quantum superposition consider) that strictly speaking it contradicts it. Because quantum superposition is a superposition of states, which can not be realized simultaneously with the classical point of view (eg, wave-particle duality).

For example, consider two quantum states (actually existing) are described by wave functions ψ1 and ψ2. From the principle of superposition it should be clearly, that their linear combination (ψ3 = C1ψ1 + C2ψ2) will be the third quantum state (as actually existing), which will be described by a wave function ψ3. What does it mean? The fact that the measurement of a certain physical value d in the state |ψ1> will result d1, and for measure a value for of d in the state |ψ2> will result d2. When the third quantum state |ψ3> is realized, then when measuring a physical quantity, the quantum system will take the values d1 and d2 with probabilities, respectively, |C1|^2 and |C2|^2. That is, in a quantum state |ψ3> when we will have many dimensions sometimes d1 value and sometimes d2 (with certain known frequency). But this is in resonance theory can not be.

We describe for simplicity resonance of two Kekule structures (resonance structures) excluding structures Dewar. Then, the resonance theory it is assumed that |ψ1> is a quantum state 1, which is describes a resonance structure 1 and |ψ2> is a quantum state 2, which is describes a resonance structure 2. The linear combination of the (ψ3 = C1ψ1 + C2ψ2) is normally the third quantum state (|ψ3>), which is described by a wave function ψ3 and will describes the actual benzene molecule (resonance hybrid). The coefficients C1 and C2 will specify the contributions of resonance structures (Kekule structures, for our case C1/C2 = 1, |С1|^2 = |С2|^2 = 0.5) in a real molecule of benzene (resonance hybrid), which can not be described by separate resonance structures. And now it is important to note that the real molecule of benzene it really real and unique, and can not have a discrete description, ie the measurements we will never "see" the one Kekule molecule (resonance structure 1), then another (resonance structure 2), and this is directly contrary to the principle of quantum superposition. Moreover, adopted in theory of resonance Kekule structure, ie resonance structures are ideal structures that do not exist in reality, because they have all the bonds are equal, and this is despite the alternation of single and double C-C bonds, which in reality are different length. Therefore, the principle of quantum superposition (for resonance theory) is not executed, even for quantum states |ψ1> and |ψ2>, because as resonance structures is not reality, and any physical quantity (real) we can not measure.

If, however, as the resonance structures we take the real "curved" Kekule structures with ties that have different lengths, then the resonance theory does not make sense, since the transition from one structure to the other will vary internuclear distance. But then the principle of quantum superposition is applicable to all three quantum states (for |ψ1> and |ψ2> it is obvious, and for |ψ3> will be the one "twisted" Kekule structure, then the other, at 50 : 50). In fact, no change bond lengths have therefore chemistry is not applicable. And so the assumption is that real benzene molecule (resonance hybrid) that is a cross between a resonance structures is genius chemical assumption, though not strictly from the standpoint of quantum mechanics, but that made it possible to qualitatively and quantitatively describe the benzene molecule, which could not represent a single formula.

This example clearly shows that in fundamental matters of chemistry did not reducible to physics, here there is a "chemical" highlight. And yet, the same theory resonance Pauling literally changed the chemistry, had a profound influence on the minds of chemists (I'm not talking about the pedagogical impact of resonance theory), and for a long time is not a textbook on organic chemistry where there are no resonance theory. Nevertheless it should be noted that when complication of the molecule (pyridine, naphthalene, anthracene, and so on) quantitative calculations becomes difficult (for the correct calculation of naphthalene is necessary to consider of about 40 resonance structures) and therefore started to use the MO method.

Resonance structures (Kekule structures with the same C-C bonds) is not electronic tautomers. Real benzene molecule is unique and no tautomerism exist. Incorrect represent benzene molecule as transitions between electronic tautomers (electrons in benzene does not migrate from one bond to another). There is a single benzene molecule, which has a constant electron distribution in time and which can not be represented by a discrete description. Therefore, it is accepted in resonance theory that every resonance structure contributes to the a real molecule (resonance hybrid) (usually chemists determined the contribution by the "eye"). And the third quantum state |ψ3> describes the real benzene molecule, which represents something between a resonance structures (remember the contribution of each resonance structure to the real structure (resonance hybrid)).

Quantum-mechanical aspects of the L. Pauling's resonance theory:

Bezverkhniy Volodymyr (viXra):

Bezverkhniy Volodymyr (Amazon):

Bezverkhniy Volodymyr (

What think?

Back to top
View user's profileSend private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
   Chemical Community Forum Index : Chemistry forum Page 1 of 1

Jump to:  

Page Chemical Forum from the Chemical Portal
WebQC.Org online education - help with your degree online